Guidelines for scholarly publishing of biodiversity data from Pensoft and EU BON

  • 01/03/2017
  • oo_120922

    While development and implementation of data publishing and sharing practices and tools have long been among the core activities of the academic publisher Pensoft, it is well-understood that as part of scholarly publishing, open data practices are also currently in transition, and hence, require a lot of collaborative and consistent efforts to establish. Based on […]

    In a nutshell: The four peer review stages in RIO explained

  • 04/10/2016
  • post-publication-peer-review-chart

    Having received a number of requests to further clarify our peer review process, we hereby provide a concise summary of the four author- and journal-organised peer review stages applicable to all research article publications submitted to RIO.    Stage 1: Author-organised pre-submission review Optional. This review process can take place in the ARPHA Writing Tool […]

    RIO supports Publons in finding this year’s Sentinels of Science

  • 19/09/2016
  • peer review week 2016 header

    Peer Review Week is coming and this year’s topic “Recognition for Review” is rather close to our hearts! Developing the concept of RIO, among our central goals was to create a workflow that allows scientists – authors, reviewers and editors alike – to get the maximum credit for their work. RIO implements one of the […]